One of the suggestions that the book makes it to "design tasks of optimal difficulty" for students to create a intrinsically motivating learning environment. How do you do this? It seems to me like a classroom would have a lot of different levels of capability as far as difficult tasks go - in almost every classroom, some students will find the task you give easy, and others will find it difficult. How do you go about determining an "optimal difficulty"?
Extrinsic motivation can be used at the wrong time, however. Sometimes, if you use extrinsic motivation too much, people begin to believe that their success is due to the reward and not due to the effort they put in. Also, in a lot of cases, when you take away the reward, the motivation to do a task goes completely away. I remember in middle school, my best friend's parents would give her $10 for every A on her report card. Once she reached high school, her parents stopped doing it because she was "an adult", and her grade went WAY down because she had no motivation anymore. Her motivation to get good grades slowly became to receive money. Once that extrinsic motivation was gone, and she hadn't gained any intrinsic motivation to good grades, and therefore stopped caring. This can happen with extrinsic motivation if it's not used correctly. The Dweck article also brings up a good point about extrinsic motivation (praise, to be specific): you have to be careful what you're praising! Praising effort is much more important then praising intelligence: giving extrinsic motivation for effort will help students to gain intrinsic motivation, whereas praising for intelligence or ability can just cause them to feel better about themselves and want to look smarter. Extrinsic motivation can be a good tool, but it needs to be used wisely.
Your question is really good! I also think that it is hard to create a balance where everyone in the classroom can find the task difficult. I know in previous modules, it suggested grouping students based on capabilities. This would allow students of similar abilities to have problems that were appropriate for their learning. Although this is not always an option, but it could be useful in some situations. I think that is why when students get to middle and high school, they begin to put them in certain classes based on abilities so that all students can be challenged, to a level of optimal difficulty. I hope this maybe gives an idea of how to create the level of optimal difficulty among students. I feel this is hard to do in the classroom, especially in elementary schools when students have the same teacher for each subject.
ReplyDeleteYou have a good point here, that generally, extrinsic motivators must be used when students are not intrinsically motivated (or if it's a boring topic they MUST learn). There are a lot of people in education who advocate for students learning through ONLY discovery, and investigating only things that interest them. They have some good arguments for this, but the main rebuttal is that there are SO MANY things that we all do BECAUSE OF extrinsic motivators. We may never know we're interested in something until we try it (because we need to enroll in that class for a degree). Or, we accomplish something great, like writing a VERY difficult intense paper or project, and feeling a sense of accomplishment.... we wouldn't do that without extrinsic motivators.
ReplyDeleteI think there are a lot of parallels between these ideas and scaffolding. The rewards are sort of like scaffolds that can and should be taken away at some point. The rewards can push someone, but if they become dependent on grades, that's not good.... That dependence may be the line that determines when extrinsic motivators go too far.