Wednesday, September 14
Vygotsky/Grouping post 2
In this module there are many differen teaching approaches looked at when dealing with cooperation and grouping in the classroom. Vygotsky and Piaget would both praise grouping, but I think they would praise different types of grouping. Piaget for example I belive would praise within class ability grouping. I think that he would praise this based on his different stages of development because each student develops at their own pace. For one to push through their stage they have to be challenged with harder material. Therefore, if a student that is more ahead than another will not be challenged if they are both learning the same material. If students are split up based on their ability then they will be with students that are capable of learning the same material. Vygotsky on the other hand may praise the cooperative classroom collaboration because everyone works together. With class ability grouping this tends to divide the students into different socioeconomic backgrounds which, Vygotsky would not agree with. If these students of different backgrounds were all cooperatively w0rking together their different backgrounds would help each other learn different materials from each other. This would also help children who are shy come out of their comfort zone and become more social with students of different cultures and socioceonomic classrooms. This could also hel pstudents become more comfortable in the classroom and with all their classmates. Each type of grouping has different pro's and con's that teachers reall need to assess when setting up teaching plans in the classroom.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think you have a misconception about Piaget from your description here. Your explanation is a little unclear, but the part "For one to push through their stage, they have to be challenged with harder material" is NOT true from a Piagetian perspective. (Vygotsky would agree with this, but not Piaget). Piaget believed that children develop through their stages biologically (teachers cannot force it by giving harder material). For children to learn (according to Piaget), the teachers should give tasks that are appropriate to the stage they're in, but which induce disequilibrium, or some conflict with their current schema (revisit that description if you're not sure how that happens).
ReplyDeleteIt's true that Piaget may recommend grouping so that children are giving ability-appropriate tasks (and they are free to develop at their natural biological pace).
Piaget may also recommend that students encounter others near their age with diverse backgrounds, so that disequilibrium happens when they discuss their differences. There are lots of KINDS of differences that may be beneficial, but since you mostly discuss cultural background--perhaps a little boy has a schema of Christmas being THE winter holiday, and then meets a little girl who celebrates Hannukah.... his schema of 'winter holiday' changes from this experience (which Piaget calls learning). The two children will probably chat in a stage/development appropriate manner (not using abstract terms or vocabulary).
Thank you, I guess I did have a misconeption of what piaget's theory was and you really helped me out.
ReplyDelete