Blog Post 1 (Deep Reading of Module 7 on Piaget)
· Describe the big picture. Did this make sense?
The big picture of this chapter is the differences between Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories and how both are important for educational purposes. The beginning of the chapter discusses individual constructivism and social constructivism. In individual constructivism a person attains knowledge from experience, and in social constructivism a person attains knowledge through interaction between knowledge and social situations. The next major concepts are the four stages of Piaget’s stage theories which include: sensorimotor (being able to think internally), pre-operational stage (representing objects with meaning), concrete operational stage (making mental representations that are correct and could be real), and formal operational stage (higher level thinking, allows people to solve problems). Next is Vygotsky’s theories which include the Zone of Proximal Development. This zone includes the many skills that children are capable of developing with the help of someone with more cognitive abilities than themselves. Other important parts of the ZPD are intersubjecivity (creation of knowledge), scaffolding (a short social support system to aide children completing a task), and internalization (when children slowly develop responsibility for tasks and then scaffolding is no longer needed). Piaget believed that development occurs before learning because people must be “ready to learn”. Piaget and Vygotsky’s theories both agreed that internalized language is needed for thoughts, used for reflection and helps in the planning function. However, they disagreed on externalized speech. At the end of the module, the author gives several principles for effective teaching regarding their developmental learning.
I'll start with addressing a POTENTIAL misconception:
ReplyDeleteI think you might understand this perfectly, but I want to be sure. As you say, the biological side of development is natural, and happens when it happens, according to Piaget. You make a very important distinction--that LEARNING does not happen passively, according to Piaget. Disequilibrium prompts learning. Then, the child ACTIVELY applies his previous knowledge or schemes (we will discuss schemes later) to the new situation. If it fits, that's great. If it doesn't, he either changes his existing scheme or creates a new one to make sense of the new experience.
I really like how you opened by saying BOTH Piaget and Vygotsky are useful to understand for educational purposes (it really isn't Piaget vs. Vygotsky at all!) That's VERY true. You need to know that, developmentally, it is true that children CANNOT learn certain things at younger ages (and those stages are very rough and vary by person). It is also true that we learn through being supported by others who are more advanced (think about how a child with an older sibling would function differently than one who doesn't). We will discuss internalization, grouping, and play more next week, but those are all Vygotsky-related concepts that are VITAL for teachers to understand.
Think about the question you ask here when you read the grouping chapter, and think more about how Vygotsky might answer this question. My first idea is that by grouping children in with others who are at different levels, they can help each other. Of course, what do you do with the MOST advanced student? There, you can step in and help to structure the most advanced students while the others are (partially) scaffolded by their peers.
One of the great challenges in a classroom as a teacher is that you have to group children based on their needs. That might be by their skill level or their attitude in the classroom. Like Jackie said you might have to group children with others who are more advanced so that way they can learn from each other. By grouping I mean arrange their desks in different groups and have them work with each other. But the most advanced student in that group might not be learning anything at all. So you have to find out your students' strengths and weaknesses. Basically you will be doing a lot of trial and eror. If one group doesn't work out then try to change it around. One thing you have to be careful about is making sure you aren't grouping children that are big talkers. And vise- versa with the children who don't talk very much. For example, one student is can be very focused on the school work but is having trouble with reading. You can try to group that student with a person can't stay focused but has strong reading skills. The first student can help the other to stay focused while he/ she helps the first student read. The student might not be staying focused because they may feel bored. So by giving them a task will help them feel important because they get to help another student out.
ReplyDeleteI cadet taught for a 2nd grade teacher when I was in the 11th grade. He gave a pre-quiz for each math unit. The students who had an especially difficult time did their work at the back table. Everyone else was at their desks. He would work with the kids in the front during their work time while I would help the ones in the back. (This seems like it would cause some separation between students when others see who is always at the back table, but I did not notice this occurring.) When I wasn't there, he spent more time in the back (while making sure everyone else was okay). I think it really helped the students. Groups do help students because they can help each other, so if you purposely pair a kid who understands the lesson well with a student who needs a little help, it would be very beneficial. (*Warning: make sure the groups work. Students can get cocky and also some people just don't get along or get along to the extent that they talk the whole time.)
ReplyDeleteI really think it gets easier to tweak a lesson as you get to know what makes your students tweak. You need to teach somewhere between your smartest and least understanding student for each unit. You should teach as many ways with as many mediums as possible. You can observe when they understand the best and use that method the most often.