One question I have is about nature vs. nurture aspect of development. The book touched on this at the beginning, but I still have some unanswered questions. This module seemed to focus on ideas that were universal -Piaget's stages and Vygotsky's ZPD seemed to be advertised as true for everyone. However, how much does an individual's environment affect their development? Would I be in the same stage as someone my age in another country, for example? Or even another state? How did the way I was raised affect my cognitive development growing up? I'm sure those are hard questions to answer, but I think that nurture has more of an effect on cognitive development than the book touched on.
Play can be very beneficial for young students. Allowing kids the freedom to discover things for themselves is very important, especially when they're younger and don't have as high of attention spans as older children do. The book touched on this, but I think the creative aspect of play is the most important for children's cognitive development. When kids are younger, they love "playing pretend" - becoming whoever they want to be. In my opinion, this creativity fosters a lot of future development. For example, kids who are pretending to be firefighters or policemen have taken that from their environment: they've observed and learned what a firefighter does, and they pretend to do just that. That's important for any age to be able to do. Detaching from who we are and putting ourselves in another person's shoes is a huge step in cognitive development, and having kids experience that on their own is wonderful. This will also help with the egocentrism described in Piaget's pre-operational stage: thinking outside of the box can help kids to stop thinking from their perspective and take another person's into account. Also, just simply the social aspect of play can help a student's ZPD. Sometimes, during recess or other play activities, kids will just sit down and talk to each other. Just simply talking, or even playing games, can help kids to learn about other people's perspectives and ideas, and that in turn can influence their ZPD. Play has a lot of positive aspects, and for children, it's a great way to have fun, but also to grow developmentally.
You bring up the nature vs. nurture question, and in pretty much every way of considering development, the answer is BOTH. The interaction of the two is really what drives development. Piaget and Vygotsky both acknowledge that, even if the book didn't make it clear for you.
ReplyDeletePiaget is well known, even now, but he did most of his observations on his own children. The stages DO vary by age, person, and the particular activity you are doing. Someone who is 9 years old could be in any of the stages depending on many factors. The more useful big idea is that humans generally go through this pattern of stages (at some pace) through development. Also, the ZPD is NOT a set range for every particular child (varies by age, the activity they're doing, etc). Again, the better message of the ZPD is just that every child has SOME range (his ZPD) in which he can do things with the help of another. Kids will vary, and you sometimes you can only discover their ZPD by watching them interact in a group of different-aged children, or just seeing what they can do.
The environment (the way you are raised, what you're surrounded by, nurture, etc) is a big influence for both Piaget and Vygotsky. The sort of schemes you develop in your mind depend on what you're exposed to at a young age. Vygotsky's social constructivism says that you develop higher mental processes by internalizing things that surround you. (Your concept of mother is internalized from the cultural idea of mother in your community, or your own mother's actions).